2nd EARA Research School, Marbach Castle, Germany, July 2003

by Olga Solomontis-Kountouri

Our second summer school took place in July 2003 at at the Marbach castle, in Germany, during the period July 20-26, 2003. Eightteen Ph.D. students participated (among which four from the United States) and the presenters/mentors were Jacquelynne Eccles, Rutger Engels, Alexander von Eye,  Luc Goossens, Leo Hendry, Marion Kloep, and Rainer Silbereisen.


Introduction-General feelings
I try to put in words the wonderful, enlightening, unique, magic experience we –participants- shared at Marbach Schloss during the 2nd EARA Summer School. The comments from all the other students who took part, helped to illustrate and enrich this report. I wish that the reader could find in between our words the feelings and the mystic we shared. From 20 to 26 of July, in Marbach Castle, in the magnificent scenery of Lake Constance, students from all over Europe and USA lived an ultimate learning experience, an unrepeatable intellectual activity, the sharing of their precious work, the guide and the support of excellent seniors, a luxurious service; moreover, they conceptualised that above their national identities they mostly share the identity of human race and from then onwards their horizons broadened. As Kerstin Pahl from USA declared: “I will never forget the wonderful week that I got to spend in Marbach. Not only did we receive a rich diet of intellectually stimulating lectures, presentations, and discussions, we were also treated to an array of worldly luxuries, including gourmet meals, luscious wines, and bucolic scenery. All this took place in the company of a diverse and interesting group of people who were talented in both scholarly discourse and… shall we call it, recreational pursuits.”

The organisation of the whole program is near perfect and it fulfilled its basic aim, which was to provide professional training to doctoral students. Everything run smoothly and in time. Everybody respected the time schedule and not a single person escaped from the program. This was admitted in the last day’s evaluation. Luc Goossens, the President-Elect of EARA and the Summer School host concluded in his evaluation report: “Everyone agreed that the second EARA Summer School at Marbach Castle was a great meeting and a very intense week. The many suggestions made by the students contributed to the formation of  the ideal summer school image that one can strive for in the future.

Belen Martinez-Ferrer from Spain remarked that: “This type of event is very useful since it allows us to know different investigation lines and complementary focuses. Moreover, knowing people from different countries who investigate adolescence has been very enriching. I am sure that all that we have learned will be very useful to improve our theses and our future research.
Not only did we feel secure in such an environment, but we did feel cared and important, and some of us felt that for the first time in our studies we were offered such luxurious services. It is like being honoured for working hard for our research. Muriel Carrere from France said about the services: “We worked in a wonderful place and the only preoccupations we had were to think about research and psychology. We had no material worries to think about and that was fantastic.

The place chosen for the event is definitely one of the most beautiful places in Europe. Marbach Castle is located on the German side of Lake Constance, in a slope of a forested hill and it faces the Swiss landscape, which lies on the other side.  In the middle, the lake shines as the river Rhine runs through it. The Castle itself is a stunning five star place.
The comments on the place and the services which were provided are numerous: “Marbach Castle seems to be such a nice place for such kind of activities. Being far from any big city, did not offer so many opportunities for night entertainment, therefore we could concentrate on our work. At the same time everything was there: tasteful food, wonderful wines, bikes, the lake and the park, a swimming pool, to name a few. That was great!
Sergey Molchanov from Russia “The surroundings of Marbach Castle were beautiful and conducive for thinking and reflecting. Everything was well organized and thought of, simply great: the food, the well-equipped environment, the nice views on the lake Constanz, the rooms, etc. It was nice to experience this luxury.
Zeena Harakeh from Netherlands “I must thank you for the choice of Marbach, where we couldn’t be better received and taken care of and for the ambience created.
Marta Texiera Bastos from Portugal “The castle was an ideal place for learning and relaxation.
Peter Titzmann from Germany “The meeting was very well organized and took place at one of the loveliest places in the southwest of Germany. Schlo� Marbach – a castle that is quite isolated – turned out to be the best environment for meeting both students and senior scientists.
Dagmar Strohmeier from Austria "The training program was very intense and stimulating. It started at 8.00 o’clock in the morning and finished at 6.00 in the afternoon with two short coffee breaks and the lunchtime. During the week we attended seven three-hour presentations from senior researchers and eighteen 45minute presentations from the PhD students. We learnt so much, in such a good educational way and in such a short time. Seniors’ presentations were highly professional and apart from the state of knowledge they offered an overview of recent state of methods and theoretical trends in the field of adolescence."
Uta Jaschinski from Switzerland states: “This is one of the best ways to learn about contents and research methods in adolescent development. During the week, I received a lot of new information and developed some ideas for my future research. The combination of instructions, student presentations, discussions and informal communication was simply great.
Zenna Harakeh from Netherland says: “It was a great and wonderful experience, which I will always remember. I learned a lot during this week about other areas of research on adolescents by reading papers on different topics, listening to lectures of senior researchers and presentations of other Ph.D. students, and by working in smaller groups thereby sharing information and knowledge and presenting this to the whole group. It was also useful to present my own study and the derived results so far, and to get feedback or advice on it.
Sonia Ranieri from Italy made similar comments: “The formal lectures and the activities organized by senior researchers, and the comparison with other PhD students from different countries gave me the opportunity to improve my knowledge about the research on adolescence, both at theoretical and methodological level. We discussed many content areas of adolescent research and different methods (i.e. qualitative and quantitative research). Moreover, during the week I received useful feedback and suggestions about my own research project, in order to improve my work.

The people: seven seniors and eighteen students participated, representing their own country and their own academic work and in a week’s time they developed life-time ties amongst them. As Zeena Harakeh said: “I have met a lot of wonderful people from all over the world and everybody was very kind, approachable and willing to discuss regarding the topics presented at the school. It was fruitful for me to find out in which specific areas they worked by listening to the presentations, and it was also very stimulating to meet people working in the same specific area as I do.” Therese Johansson from Sweden added: “Not only did I learn a great deal about research on adolescence, I also met many very interesting people with whom I hope to be able to collaborate in the future.” Jessica Garrett from USA concluded: “It was an honor to meet generous senior researchers who are at the top in their field and other students who are poised to join them.  Being in the company of others who are thinking about the same issues that I care about, though perhaps from a slightly different angle, encouraged me to broaden my perspective academically.  And with so many countries and so many cultures represented, the summer school also forced me to think outside of my Ameri-centric box.”

The seniors: Luc Goossens, Jacquelynne Eccles, Rainer Silbereisen, Leo Hendry, Marion Kloep, Alexander Von Eye, Rutger Engels are all simply great people. Sergey Molchanov from Russia described them as: “democratic and open to student’s questions and eager to discuss scientific themes.” Peter Titzmann from Germany said that: “The teachers were excellent and did not only cover a wide range of topics in adolescence research, but also had different methodological approaches.” Vilmante Pakalniskiene from Lithuania added: “Senior researchers suggested that we could write to them, if we have any problems with our research. They left ‘the door open’. I think, that is very good for people from small countries.

Seniors presentations, the activities they organized and the feedback they gave to the students were the cores of the success of this summer school. Students received the best picture of the seniors and have models to work for themselves. Hence, they made the best comments:
I liked the lectures of our senior researchers very much, especially those that were devoted to the identity and its components”. Sergey Molchanov from Russia “The most interesting and useful thing was the activities organized by the senior researchers in conjunction with their more formal lectures. I think that is a very good way to learn something and to see how theoretical bases are realized. It’s a good way to test theory. I have never had such activities at my university." "In Lithuania it’s not popular to make such activities. But I think, that is the best way to simplify complicated things. And also activities make you involved to work as a team member, to talk, to discuss, to think, and not only to be a passive member or listener.” Vilmante Pakalniskiene from Lithuania. “The group discussions during the working sessions were amazing and a pure pleasure. Exchanging ideas and opinions were just fascinating.” Dagmar Strohmeier from Austria.

Students praised seniors’ feedback and counseling in particular.
Personally, the feedback I received after my presentation and the individual counseling from the seniors attributed to me, made me feel ready and confident to write up my thesis. The impressions from the other students are similar: “All the senior researchers have done a great job in providing us with a unique and productive academic environment, where we could get feedback and advice for our project” Marta Texiera Bastos from Portugal “During the numerous interactions with the teachers, both formal and informal, I came to realize how much each and everyone of them made efforts to give the students the very best information and feedback.” Therese Johansson from Sweden “The seniors researchers were fantastic, always open to questions. They helped me answer some of the questions I had on the second part of my thesis and to solve some problem on the first part. It was very enriching.” Muriel Carrere from France “…rarely do American students have such a forum to receive feedback from some of the world’s best researchers in the field of adolescent research. The knowledge I gained during this week is some of the most valuable knowledge I have ever learned, most basically calling into question the basic values and assumptions I make in my research.” Jordan Wright from USA “Especially useful were consultations with senior scientists, where students could discuss issues of interest face to face during breaks or in the evening.” Peter Titzmann from Germany

The students: Uta, Silvia, Kerstin, Marta, Sergey, Therese, Vilma, Jessica, Neslihan, Peter, Dagmar, Jordan, Muriel, Zeena, Sonia, Belen, Kristin and me, Olga were impressed by each other and we enjoyed each other’s company and became good friends. Sergey Molchanov from Russia expressed these feelings: “I was impressed that the students themselves were very warm and cared about each other. The presentation itself seemed quite nervous for most of us, and students provided mutual psychological support. That seemed to be very natural and warm. People were ready to communicate with each other and different themes were aroused. That helps to understand other cultures better and this is also very important.”  Marta Texiera Bastos from Portugal also remarked: “Students from both sides of the Atlantic and from very different countries could get to know not just each others’ work, but also each others ways of living.”

Students’ presentations were all presented in a power point and were praised for their quality and their administration. As only one meeting room was available, there were no parallel sessions for the student presentations and each student presented his/her work for all. Students welcomed this change, which proved to be very beneficial. Here are some positive comments from the students: “I liked the form of students presentations when after your speech you answer questions and listen to comments. That helped me see the disadvantages of my work and think how to avoid them in future. I’ve done already some changes in my future dissertation work. Moreover, I can say that listening to other presentations also helps to estimate your own work. That’s why I think that it is better not to have parallel sessions for student’s presentations but to have one session for all of them.” Sergey Molchanov from Russia
I was very impressed with the excellent projects, which were presented by the PhD students.” Dagmar Strohmeier from Austria
As a PhD student I took beneficial knowledge from senior researchers and PhD students. I presented my own PhD.  It was a wonderful opportunity for a PhD student. I received very useful feedback and counseling from everybody who participated in the summer school. I believe this information will be useful for my research.” Neslihan Guney from Turkey
It was a great help to my dissertation project, and I could get a lot of useful advice from other students and senior researchers”. Szilvia Jambori from Hangary

Students’ experiences were exchanged during informal discussions. A favourite topic was the different PhD programs in Europe and USA. As Kristin L. Moilanen from USA writes: “Although the week was primarily spent in intense working sessions, opportunities for informal socialization were built into the busy schedule. Over gourmet meals, students and faculty discussed expectations for students and researchers in their home countries and compared notes on their respective doctoral programs. Several European students were surprised that doctoral programs take so many years to complete in the United States.” Dagmar Strohmeier from Austria also remarked: “The warm and friendly atmosphere between the participants made it easy to engage in challenging discussions during and after the working sessions. To get in touch with a very diverse group of people – students and seniors from both Europe and the United States – gave us all the opportunity to learn not only from the scientific work but also about the various countries and circumstances at the Universities all over Europe and the States.”   
The relationships that developed are a life asset for everyone, strengthened our EARA Students’ organisation and established a brotherly connection with SRA Students’ organisation. All students invest in these relationships:
It was very nice to meet other people, students from different countries. It’s good to choose summer school participants from different countries. So, then you have a chance to compare your opportunities, the education system and research with other countries. You have also a chance to make new contacts, to discuss common projects and to collaborate with them in future.” Vilmante Pakalniskiene from Lithuania
All in all it was a delightfully memorable week. I liked the people and all that we learned and the beautiful accommodations and the connections we all made. I believe we made some lasting relationship that we will be able to build on. These personal, international ties among young researchers are what will build an international community of inquiry into the future.” Jessica Garrett from USA
Students from both sides of the Atlantic and from very different countries could get to know not just each others’ work, but also each others’ ways of living.” Marta Texiera Bastos from Portugal
I had a lot of friends from different countries and I realized the cultural differences   on adolescence and education. I believe that we will continue this relationship in the future.” Neslihan Guney from Turkey
The future careers of the students were marked by the experiences, the benefits and the relations from the 2nd EARA Summer School. Peter Titzmann from Germany made the first step: “Besides discussions and gained knowledge the atmosphere was very productive and students as well as senior scientists got into contact very well; that will last even after this summer school (e.g. there will be a submission of a symposium at the coming ISSBD conference in Ghent as a direct result of the EARA summer school in Marbach)”. Dagmar Strohmeier from Austria remarked: “I think attending a meeting like the EARA summer school is such a big gain for students and their future careers.” Sonia Ranieri from Italy said: “Finally, the Summer School gave us the possibility to create a widespread network of nice and bright PhD students, and approachable and qualified senior researchers.
I would like to conclude this report with a remark from Jordan Wright, SRA students’ president: “On a more personal note, I feel that I have made both friends and colleagues that I am excited about working with for the rest of my life.  I am forever indebted to the Jacobs Foundation for affording me this opportunity to broaden my horizons, think about issues of adolescent research that are rarely discussed within the United States, have some of the most stimulating conversations I have ever had, and begin networking with potential collaborators Americans too often do not have the resources to seek out.”
For all these and from the bottom of our heart thanks to the contributors of the successful 2nd EARA Summer School:
Hakan Stattin - the visionary, Peter Noack - the organiser, Luc Goossens - the host, Jacque Eccles – the unifier, all the seniors – the gurus and to all unknown contributors. Mostly and especially we own great thanks to Jacobs Foundation, the sponsors of this event, without their financial cover this event would not be possible.

Below you find presentations given by senior researchers and doctoral students.
You can click on them to download them to your computer.

Senior researchers:

  • Jacque Eccles on School transitions, gender roles, and adolescent development

  • Rutger Engels on New insights in peer relations in adolescence: The role of parents in peer relations in adolescence

  • Alexander von Eye on Rater agreement: Statistical models

  • Luc Goossens on Identity development in late adolescence:A longitudinal approach

  • Leo Hendry on Adolescent health: A theoretical model and its implications

  • Marion Kloep on 'Ripples on the pond?': Adolescent identity in a local, regional, national, and international context

  • Rainer Silbereisen on Frontiers of research on adolescence-Social change and human development: The case of German unification

  • Doctoral students

  • Kerstin Pahl on Longitudinal trajectories of ethnic identity development among low-income, urban, ethnic and racial minority adolescents: A growth model

  • Peter Titzmann on Acculurative experiences of adolescent immigrants

  • Vilmante Pakalniskiene on Children who experience verbal/symbolic aggresion (interactions) at home: Their relationships with peers and their relationships with parents, children's character, temper, and personality features that could influence these verbal/symbolic acts

  • Sonia Ranieri on Family functioning and psychosocial competence in adolescence: A cross-cultural study

  • A. Jordan Wright on Resistance to peer and advertising pressure and substance use in an early adolescent urban minority sample

  • Zeena Harakeh on Parent and peer influences on adolescents' smoking behavior

  • Marta Teixeira Bastos on Loneliness and attachment in adolescence and young adulthood: Relationships with coping strategies and internet use

  • Uta Jaschinski on Peer versus cross-age tutoring: Improving computer literacy, achievement motivation, and social skills of socially disadvantaged adolescents by peer-tutoring

  • Szilvia J�mbori on Socialization agents influencing adolescents' future orientation, attitudes towards competition, and success-orientation

  • Sergey Molchanov on Adolescent value-moral orientation in different socio-cultural backgrounds

  • Muriel Carrere on The development of skills to regulate conflicts in friend and love relationships of children and adolescents

  • Dagmar Strohmeier on Aggression as an intergroup phenomen: Dynamics of interethnic conflicts in children

  • Kirstin Moilanen on Measuring self-regulation in children and adolescents

  • Olga Solomontes-Kountouri on Development, content and context of adolescent identity: Politics, religion, occupation, and gender roles

  • Jessica L. Garrett on The transition from school to work in non-university-bound youth

  • Therese Johansson on Pubertal maturation and adjustment

  • Belen Martinez Ferrer on Family functioning, sociometric status and violence in the school

  • Neslihan Gueney on Developmental investigation of adolescent risk-taking behavior in terms of psychosocial variables in a Turkish sample

  •